would rather not inconvenience our users by stopping lm78 at ... I've seen little spam get through the paradyne blocker to me lately. Perhaps it is already looking at the tag... mds phil at netroedge.com wrote: > > That's a possibility. We still get legit emails to both, but I could > put an auto-reply asking the sender to resend their message to > 'sensors@'. > > BTW- I use 'spambouncer' scripts to tag messages. It does a pretty > good job (about 90% accurate). It automaticly blocks knows virii, but > only tags and lets through spam. You can see if it has been tagged as > likely spam by looking for this in the header: > > X-SBClass: Blocked > > I'd block everything which has that except there are still a number of > mails it tags this way which are still legit. > > Phil > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 10:10:27AM +0200, Khali wrote: > > > > Hi everyone > > > > Could we please definitely choose one of the addresses for the mailing list (lm78@ or sensors@) and invalidate the other? It would divide by 2 the amount of spam we are receiving... > > > > Thanks > > > > -- > > Khali > > > > > > ___________________________________ > > Webmail Nerim, http://www.nerim.net/ > > > > -- > Philip Edelbrock -- IS Manager -- Edge Design, Corvallis, OR > phil at netroedge.com -- http://www.netroedge.com/~phil > PGP F16: 01 D2 FD 01 B5 46 F4 F0 3A 8B 9D 7E 14 7F FB 7A
