yes. I get it, makes sense now. Ky?sti M?lkki wrote: > > On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, Mark D. Studebaker wrote: > > > Ky?sti M?lkki wrote: > > > > > Two successive Write Quick "0" become Write Byte, only changing the > > > reference for Read Byte transactions. This is i2cdetect operation and > > > causes no corruption. > > > > > > S 0x54 Wr [A] <P><S> 0x55 Wr [A] P > > > > > > If this is the case, latter of the two Write Quick commands is always > > > acknowledged by 24rf08, and does not reflect a client at that address. > > > > > If this were the case I would not get a detection at 0x54 and I would > > get a detection at 0x58. But I correctly get a detection at 0x54-0x57. > > This is true whether I use Write Quick "0" or Write Quick "1". > > You would get a detection at 0x54, since at that point 24rf08 > acknowledges its address. You would not get a detection at 0x58, since > there was an even number of Write Quicks. > > Scan range 0x57 to 0x58. > > -- > Ky?sti M?lkki > kmalkki at cc.hut.fi
