so do you recommend that we add 1027 support to adm1024 or lm87, or make a new driver? > Roger Orchard wrote: > > we have a card with an adm1027 (this is one of the first R&D broads, > with the chip on) > > the adm1024 driver thinks that the adm1027 is the adm1024. > > talking to "Analog Devices" they say that you should check:- > > I believe that you can look at the Revision Reg 0x3F > > If it has a value of 0x10 - 0x1F, then it is a 1024 > If it has a value of 0x60 - 0x6F, then it is a 1027 > > Also, as further verification, there are registers in the 1024 that do > not exist in the 1027 and visa versa. > > we have also been looking at the LM87 witch is almost the same chip > but from "National Semiconductor" > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Roger > Tut System (UK) Ltd > +44 1865 78 45 60
