thanks.
We have already implemented something similar in CVS.
Juan Quintela wrote:
>
> Hi
> could you update this patch, please?
> As you can see, there is not new behaviour, only cleaner code
> & print messages.
>
> Later, Juan.
>
> diff -u linux/drivers/i2c/i2c-amd756.c.orig linux/drivers/i2c/i2c-amd756.c
> --- linux/drivers/i2c/i2c-amd756.c.orig 2002-05-07 11:18:20.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux/drivers/i2c/i2c-amd756.c 2002-05-07 11:20:30.000000000 +0200
> @@ -52,10 +52,13 @@
> #ifndef PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_766
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_766 0x7413
> #endif
> +#ifndef PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_768
> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_768 0x7443
> +#endif
>
> static int supported[] = {PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_756,
> PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_766,
> - 0x7443, /* AMD768 */
> + PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_768,
> 0 };
>
> /* AMD756 SMBus address offsets */
> @@ -453,7 +456,7 @@
> amd756_initialized = 0;
> if ((res = amd756_setup())) {
> printk
> - ("i2c-amd756.o: AMD756/766 not detected, module not inserted.\n");
> + ("i2c-amd756.o: AMD756/766/768 not detected, module not inserted.\n");
> amd756_cleanup();
> return res;
> }
> @@ -467,7 +470,7 @@
> return res;
> }
> amd756_initialized++;
> - printk("i2c-amd756.o: AMD756/766 bus detected and initialized\n");
> + printk("i2c-amd756.o: AMD756/766/768 bus detected and initialized\n");
> return 0;
> }
>
>
> --
> In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they
> are different -- Larry McVoy
