A while ago we converted any // comments to the /* */ kind. I think Frodo had some good reasons for doing this, although I don't remember right now what they were. Perhaps it is for compiler compatibility? I guess if for nothing else, it would be nice to convert those for consistency sake. Looking at Linus' CodingStyle doc, he doesn't say how to comment, but says to try to comment exclusively at the head of functions and to explain what the code does and not how. (If it's not clear how the code works, then it should be rewritten to clarify it.) Phil On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 03:15:39PM -0500, Mark Studebaker wrote: > sorry. I did get it. > The original 405 stuff came from Tom Rini at MontaVista. > Is it safe to assume that you two are working together? > > WIth files being renamed it will take a little while to get this checked in > because that's harder in CVS. > > BTW, what does OCP stand for? > > Also, are we allowed to use // comments in the kernel? > > Armin Kuster wrote: > > > > Mark, > > > > I have not heard back on this patch I sent out earlier this week. > > > > Any status? > > > > regards, > > -- > > ===================================================== > > Armin Kuster MontaVista Software Inc. > > Embedded Linux Consultant 1237 East Arques Ave > > Phone (408) 328-0305 Sunnyvale CA 94085 > > Fax (408) 328-9204 www.support.mvista.com > > ===================================================== -- Philip Edelbrock -- IS Manager -- Edge Design, Corvallis, OR phil at netroedge.com -- http://www.netroedge.com/~phil PGP F16: 01 D2 FD 01 B5 46 F4 F0 3A 8B 9D 7E 14 7F FB 7A
