I made the naming change you suggested in eeprom.c and fixed decode-dimms and decode-xeon, unfortunately I don't have a Perl book at home so I need your help to fix decode-vaio, if you would please send me a patch that would be great. thanks mds Jean Delvare wrote: > > > I think all three we could use if you would like to submit patches. > I will. > > > On 1), what I kept meaning to do but never did, can you rename the > > /proc names from "0-15", for example, to "00" or "00-0F" or "0x00-0x0F" > > or something similar, so that when you "cat *" at least the results > > come out in the right alphabetical order? > > That's bitten me more than once... > I agree. It makes things much more complicated for everyone, even if > "ls -v" can help for this particular point. > > Anyway, I won't modify that unless anyone agrees. I'm rather new to this > project and this ain't a decision I can make alone. If I am the one who > decides, I would even remove the heading "data" and remove the end > address, since it can be deduced from the start address. I would have > something like that : > > eeprom-i2c-0-50/00 > eeprom-i2c-0-50/10 > eeprom-i2c-0-50/20 > eeprom-i2c-0-50/30 > eeprom-i2c-0-50/40 > eeprom-i2c-0-50/50 > eeprom-i2c-0-50/60 > eeprom-i2c-0-50/70 > > Now, I don't know everything about the needs of everyone, so I'd like to > know what people think about it. What's sure is that it would require to > rewite some utils, such as the dimms decoder. > > So, please, everyone let me know if it is a good idea or not. > > (Anyway, it does *note* need to be changed right now. I can submit my > patches and wait some time that we all agree if a change in the file names > is a good thing or not.) > > -- > /~~ Jean "Khali" Delvare > -----\_ mail: delvare at ensicaen.ismra.fr > --------\ http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/ > ---=ISMRA/- ____________________________________________________
