Here comes the output of isadump output (which was missing in previous
e-mail)
[root at localhost root]# isadump -f 0
[...]
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a b c d e f
00: e4 38 43 fd 00 ff b6 e0 80 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
10: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
20: 80 f8 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
30: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
40: 80 0e 98 b4 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
50: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
60: 9c 3c ff ff 14 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
70: 00 36 00 00 00 36 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
80: 94 26 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
90: ff ff 02 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
a0: 00 27 ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff
b0: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
c0: a8 64 b7 f8 a2 f9 10 23 54 20 a5 6d 7b a8 a0 b8
d0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
e0: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
f0: 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
P.S. I don't know what I have changed, but now the sensors-detect detect
properly ITE IT8712F sensors chip (and also misdetect it as LM78 chip).
The only error is that sensors-detect claims that one should use LM87
(instead of looking on the motherboard or motherboard/chipset website for
the sensors chip used) even though both chips have _the same_ confidence.
It is also strange that the summary for LM78 and IT87 chips is
inconsistient: it differs in form.
The shortened log follows:
[root at localhost root]# modprobe i2c-viapro i2c-dev i2c-isa
[root at localhost root]# modprobe it87 ignore=0,0x2d temp_type=0x38
[root at localhost root]# lsmod
Module Size Used by
it87 6704 0 (unused)
i2c-proc 6128 0 [it87]
i2c-dev 3616 0 (unused)
i2c-isa 1152 0 (unused)
i2c-viapro 3648 0 (unused)
i2c-core 13248 0 [it87 i2c-proc i2c-dev i2c-isa i2c-viapro]
[...]
[root at localhost root]# sensors -s
[root at localhost root]# sensors-detect
[...]
Next adapter: SMBus Via Pro adapter at 5000 (Non-I2C SMBus adapter)
Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively):
Client found at address 0x2d
Probing for 'National Semiconductor LM78'... Success!
(confidence 7, driver 'lm78')
Probing for 'ITE IT8705F / IT8712F / SiS 950'... Success!
(confidence 7, driver 'it87')
Client found at address 0x50
Probing for 'Serial EEPROM (PC-100 DIMM)'... Success!
(confidence 8, driver 'eeprom')
Client found at address 0x69
Some chips are also accessible through the ISA bus. ISA probes are
typically a bit more dangerous, as we have to write to I/O ports to do
this. Do you want to scan the ISA bus? (YES/no):
Probing for 'National Semiconductor LM78'
Trying address 0x0290... Success!
(confidence 7, driver 'lm78')
Alias of the chip on I2C bus 'SMBus Via Pro adapter at 5000', address 0x002d
Probing for 'ITE IT8705F / IT8712F / SiS 950'
Trying address 0x0290... Success!
(confidence 7, driver 'it87')
Now follows a summary of the probes I have just done.
Just press ENTER to continue:
Driver `lm78' (should be inserted):
Detects correctly:
* Bus `SMBus Via Pro adapter at 5000' (Non-I2C SMBus adapter)
Busdriver `i2c-viapro', I2C address 0x2d
ISA bus address 0x0290 (Busdriver `i2c-isa')
Chip `National Semiconductor LM78' (confidence: 7)
Driver `it87' (may not be inserted):
Misdetects:
* Bus `SMBus Via Pro adapter at 5000' (Non-I2C SMBus adapter)
Busdriver `i2c-viapro', I2C address 0x2d
Chip `ITE IT8705F / IT8712F / SiS 950' (confidence: 7)
* ISA bus address 0x0290 (Busdriver `i2c-isa')
Chip `ITE IT8705F / IT8712F / SiS 950' (confidence: 7)
Driver `eeprom' (should be inserted):
Detects correctly:
* Bus `SMBus Via Pro adapter at 5000' (Non-I2C SMBus adapter)
Busdriver `i2c-viapro', I2C address 0x50
Chip `Serial EEPROM (PC-100 DIMM)' (confidence: 8)
--
Jakub Nar?bski
Poland
