On Wed, 2024-09-25 at 14:40 +0800, Wardenjohn wrote: > As previous discussion, maintainers think that patch-level sysfs > interface is the > only acceptable way to maintain the information of the order that > klp_patch is > applied to the system. > > However, the previous patch introduce klp_ops into klp_func is a > optimization > methods of the patch introducing 'using' feature to klp_func. > > But now, we don't support 'using' feature to klp_func and make > 'klp_ops' patch > not necessary. > > Therefore, this new version is only introduce the sysfs feature of > klp_patch > 'stack_order'. The approach seems ok to me, but I would like to see selftests for this new attribute. We have been trying to add more and more selftests for existing known behavior, so IMO adding a new attribute should contain a new test to exercise the correct behavior. Other than that, for the series: Acked-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@xxxxxxxx> > > V1 -> V2: > 1. According to the suggestion from Petr, to make the meaning more > clear, rename > 'order' to 'stack_order'. > 2. According to the suggestion from Petr and Miroslav, this patch now > move the > calculating process to stack_order_show function. Adding klp_mutex > lock protection. > > Regards. > Wardenjohn. >
