[no subject]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

It the livepatches need a new synchronization mechanism, they
might allocate the lock in yet another shadow variable.

Do I miss anything, please?
Could you come up with a reasonable semantic, please?

Best Regards,
Petr

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Prev by Date: Re: [POC 0/7] livepatch: Make livepatch states, callbacks, and shadow variables work together
Next by Date: [PATCH v3 0/2] livepatch: Add using attribute to klp_func for using function
Previous by thread: [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix kallsyms with CONFIG_LTO_CLANG
Next by thread: [PATCH v3 0/2] livepatch: Add using attribute to klp_func for using function
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux