Hi Masami,
On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 6:45 AM Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2 Aug 2024 14:08:34 -0700
> Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > With CONFIG_LTO_CLANG=y, the compiler may add suffix to function names
> > to avoid duplication. This causes confusion with users of kallsyms.
> > On one hand, users like livepatch are required to match the symbols
> > exactly. On the other hand, users like kprobe would like to match to
> > original function names.
> >
> > Solve this by splitting kallsyms APIs. Specifically, existing APIs now
> > should match the symbols exactly. Add two APIs that match only the part
> > without .XXXX suffix. Specifically, the following two APIs are added.
> >
> > 1. kallsyms_lookup_name_without_suffix()
> > 2. kallsyms_on_each_match_symbol_without_suffix()
> >
> > These APIs will be used by kprobe.
> >
> > Also cleanup some code and update kallsyms_selftests accordingly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Looks good to me, but I have a nitpick.
>
>
> > --- a/kernel/kallsyms.c
> > +++ b/kernel/kallsyms.c
> > @@ -164,30 +164,27 @@ static void cleanup_symbol_name(char *s)
> > {
> > char *res;
> >
> > - if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LTO_CLANG))
> > - return;
> > -
> > /*
> > * LLVM appends various suffixes for local functions and variables that
> > * must be promoted to global scope as part of LTO. This can break
> > * hooking of static functions with kprobes. '.' is not a valid
> > - * character in an identifier in C. Suffixes only in LLVM LTO observed:
> > - * - foo.llvm.[0-9a-f]+
> > + * character in an identifier in C, so we can just remove the
> > + * suffix.
> > */
> > - res = strstr(s, ".llvm.");
> > + res = strstr(s, ".");
>
> nit: "strchr(s, '.')" ?
>
> Anyway,
>
> Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks for your kind review!
If we have another version, I will fold this change (and the one in
kallsyms_selftest.c) in.
Song
