On Tue 2024-05-21 08:34:46, Miroslav Benes wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, 20 May 2024, zhang warden wrote: > > > > > > > > On May 20, 2024, at 14:46, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Mon, 20 May 2024, Wardenjohn wrote: > > > > > >> Livepatch module usually used to modify kernel functions. > > >> If the patched function have bug, it may cause serious result > > >> such as kernel crash. > > >> > > >> This is a kobject attribute of klp_func. Sysfs interface named > > >> "called" is introduced to livepatch which will be set as true > > >> if the patched function is called. > > >> > > >> /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/<object>/<function,sympos>/called > > >> > > >> This value "called" is quite necessary for kernel stability > > >> assurance for livepatching module of a running system. > > >> Testing process is important before a livepatch module apply to > > >> a production system. With this interface, testing process can > > >> easily find out which function is successfully called. > > >> Any testing process can make sure they have successfully cover > > >> all the patched function that changed with the help of this interface. > > > > > > Even easier is to use the existing tracing infrastructure in the kernel > > > (ftrace for example) to track the new function. You can obtain much more > > > information with that than the new attribute provides. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Miroslav > > Hi Miroslav > > > > First, in most cases, testing process is should be automated, which make > > using existing tracing infrastructure inconvenient. > > could you elaborate, please? We use ftrace exactly for this purpose and > our testing process is also more or less automated. > > > Second, livepatch is > > already use ftrace for functional replacement, I don’t think it is a > > good choice of using kernel tracing tool to trace a patched function. > > Why? > > > At last, this attribute can be thought of as a state of a livepatch > > function. It is a state, like the "patched" "transition" state of a > > klp_patch. Adding this state will not break the state consistency of > > livepatch. > > Yes, but the information you get is limited compared to what is available > now. You would obtain the information that a patched function was called > but ftrace could also give you the context and more. Another motivation to use ftrace for testing is that it does not affect the performance in production. We should keep klp_ftrace_handler() as fast as possible so that we could livepatch also performance sensitive functions. Best Regards, Petr
