The idiom is written as "step over" instead, which means walking over something [1]; although it should have meant getting involved (interfere) in each other redirection method's effect [2], as implied in the surrounding context. Correct the idiom. Link: https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/step+over [1] Link: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/step-on-toes [2] Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> --- I choose to keep the singular version of 'each other' since it refers to individual redirection method (see [3] for grammatical explanation of why it is the case ). [3]: https://jakubmarian.com/each-others-vs-each-others-in-english/ Documentation/livepatch/livepatch.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/livepatch/livepatch.rst b/Documentation/livepatch/livepatch.rst index 68e3651e8af925..000059b3cbde49 100644 --- a/Documentation/livepatch/livepatch.rst +++ b/Documentation/livepatch/livepatch.rst @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ and livepatching: are in any way modified. All three approaches need to modify the existing code at runtime. Therefore -they need to be aware of each other and not step over each other's toes. +they need to be aware of each other and not step on each other's toes. Most of these problems are solved by using the dynamic ftrace framework as a base. A Kprobe is registered as a ftrace handler when the function entry is probed, see CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE. Also an alternative function from -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
