On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 11:41:31AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > Hi, > > On 11/27/23 07:57, attreyee-muk wrote: > > Respected Maintainers, > > > > I have made some grammatical changes in the livepatch.rst file where I > > felt that the sentence would have sounded more correct and would have become easy for > > beginners to understand by reading. > > Requesting review of my proposed changes from the mainatiners. > > > > Thank You > > Attreyee Mukherjee > > > > Signed-off-by: attreyee-muk <tintinm2017@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Documentation/livepatch/livepatch.rst | 8 ++++---- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/livepatch/livepatch.rst b/Documentation/livepatch/livepatch.rst > > index 68e3651e8af9..a2d2317b7d6b 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/livepatch/livepatch.rst > > +++ b/Documentation/livepatch/livepatch.rst > > @@ -35,11 +35,11 @@ and livepatching: > > > > All three approaches need to modify the existing code at runtime. Therefore > > -they need to be aware of each other and not step over each other's toes. > > +they need to be aware of each other and not step over each others' toes. > > I've never seen that written like that, so I disagree here. FWIW. "Step over" is new to me too. I see "step on" much more often. As far as placement of the apostrophe, https://ludwig.guru/s/step+on+each+others+toes suggests either omitting the apostrophe or placing it after the s, as attreyee-muk has done is most common.
