Re: [PATCH] ftrace: Allow inline functions not inlined to be traced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 04:41:02PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Over 10 years ago there were many bugs that caused function tracing to
> crash because some inlined function was not inlined and should not have
> been traced. This made it hard to debug because when the developer tried
> to reproduce it, if their compiler still inlined the function, the bug
> would not trigger. The solution back then was simply to add "notrace" to
> "inline" which would make sure all functions that are marked inline are
> never traced even when the compiler decides to not inline them.
> 
> A lot has changed over the last 10 years.
> 
> 1) ftrace_test_recursion_trylock() is now used by all ftrace hooks which
>    will prevent the recursive crashes from happening that was caused by
>    inlined functions being traced.
> 
> 2) noinstr is now used to mark pretty much all functions that would also
>    cause problems if they are traced.
> 
> Today, it is no longer a problem if an inlined function is not inlined and
> is traced. Removing notrace from inline has been requested several times
> over the years. I believe it is now safe to do so.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Unfortunately, from a quick build-test of arm64 there are a bunch of places
that are currently inline that need to be __always_inline for this to be safe.
Notably we have a few low-level helpers like is_kernel_in_hyp_mode() that are
only inlines, and those get used in the bowels of our entry code before we've
restored some HW state (e.g. in arch_nmi_enter()).

I'm happy to go audit and fixup arm64, but that will take some work.

Maybe it's worth having something like:

#ifdef ARCH_CAN_TRACE_INLINE
#define __notrace_inline
#else
#define __notrace_inline	notrace
#endif

... so that we can opt-in where this is safe, (e.g. on x86)?

Thanks,
Mark.

> ---
>  include/linux/compiler_types.h | 7 +++----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/compiler_types.h b/include/linux/compiler_types.h
> index 547ea1ff806e..c8f23ba1c339 100644
> --- a/include/linux/compiler_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/compiler_types.h
> @@ -182,9 +182,8 @@ struct ftrace_likely_data {
>   * externally visible function. This makes extern inline behave as per gnu89
>   * semantics rather than c99. This prevents multiple symbol definition errors
>   * of extern inline functions at link time.
> - * A lot of inline functions can cause havoc with function tracing.
>   */
> -#define inline inline __gnu_inline __inline_maybe_unused notrace
> +#define inline inline __gnu_inline __inline_maybe_unused
>  
>  /*
>   * gcc provides both __inline__ and __inline as alternate spellings of
> @@ -230,7 +229,7 @@ struct ftrace_likely_data {
>   *     https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67368
>   * '__maybe_unused' allows us to avoid defined-but-not-used warnings.
>   */
> -# define __no_kasan_or_inline __no_sanitize_address notrace __maybe_unused
> +# define __no_kasan_or_inline __no_sanitize_address __maybe_unused
>  # define __no_sanitize_or_inline __no_kasan_or_inline
>  #else
>  # define __no_kasan_or_inline __always_inline
> @@ -247,7 +246,7 @@ struct ftrace_likely_data {
>   * disable all instrumentation. See Kconfig.kcsan where this is mandatory.
>   */
>  # define __no_kcsan __no_sanitize_thread __disable_sanitizer_instrumentation
> -# define __no_sanitize_or_inline __no_kcsan notrace __maybe_unused
> +# define __no_sanitize_or_inline __no_kcsan __maybe_unused
>  #else
>  # define __no_kcsan
>  #endif
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux