Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] ftrace: disable preemption when recursion locked

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 17:48:10 +0800
王贇 <yun.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > The two comments should be updated too since Steven removed the "bit == 0" 
> > trick.  
> 
> Could you please give more hint on how will it be correct?
> 
> I get the point that bit will no longer be 0, there are only -1 or > 0 now
> so trace_test_and_set_recursion() will disable preemption on bit > 0 and
> trace_clear_recursion() will enabled it since it should only be called when
> bit > 0 (I remember we could use a WARN_ON here now :-P).
> 
> >   
> >> @@ -178,7 +187,7 @@ static __always_inline void trace_clear_recursion(int bit)
> >>   * tracing recursed in the same context (normal vs interrupt),
> >>   *
> >>   * Returns: -1 if a recursion happened.
> >> - *           >= 0 if no recursion
> >> + *           > 0 if no recursion.
> >>   */
> >>  static __always_inline int ftrace_test_recursion_trylock(unsigned long ip,
> >>  							 unsigned long parent_ip)  
> > 
> > And this change would not be correct now.  
> 
> I thought it will no longer return 0 so I change it to > 0, isn't that correct?

No it is not. I removed the bit + 1 return value, which means it returns the
actual bit now. Which is 0 or more.

-- Steve



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux