Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] sched: Simplify wake_up_*idle*()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 10:56:48AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:47:32PM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> > Peter, any thoughts? I did confirm that reverting the commit fixed the issue.
> > 
> > On 10/13/2021 10:32 AM, Qian Cai wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On 9/29/2021 11:17 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > >> --- a/kernel/smp.c
> > >> +++ b/kernel/smp.c
> > >> @@ -1170,14 +1170,14 @@ void wake_up_all_idle_cpus(void)
> > >>  {
> > >>  	int cpu;
> > >>  
> > >> -	preempt_disable();
> > >> +	cpus_read_lock();
> > >>  	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> > >> -		if (cpu == smp_processor_id())
> > >> +		if (cpu == raw_smp_processor_id())
> > >>  			continue;
> > >>  
> > >>  		wake_up_if_idle(cpu);
> > >>  	}
> > >> -	preempt_enable();
> > >> +	cpus_read_unlock();
> 
> Right, so yesterday I thought: YW2KGrvvv/vSA+97@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> but today I might have another idea, lemme go prod at this a bit more.

Here, hows this then?

---
diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
index ad0b68a3a3d3..61ddc7a3bafa 100644
--- a/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/kernel/smp.c
@@ -1170,14 +1170,12 @@ void wake_up_all_idle_cpus(void)
 {
 	int cpu;
 
-	cpus_read_lock();
-	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
-		if (cpu == raw_smp_processor_id())
-			continue;
-
-		wake_up_if_idle(cpu);
+	for_each_cpu(cpu) {
+		preempt_disable();
+		if (cpu != smp_processor_id() && cpu_online(cpu))
+			wake_up_if_idle(cpu);
+		preempt_enable();
 	}
-	cpus_read_unlock();
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wake_up_all_idle_cpus);
 



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux