On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 09:37:01PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 6:10 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Make sure to prod idle CPUs so they call klp_update_patch_state().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > kernel/livepatch/transition.c | 5 ++++-
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > --- a/kernel/livepatch/transition.c
> > +++ b/kernel/livepatch/transition.c
> > @@ -413,8 +413,11 @@ void klp_try_complete_transition(void)
> > for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> > task = idle_task(cpu);
> > if (cpu_online(cpu)) {
> > - if (!klp_try_switch_task(task))
> > + if (!klp_try_switch_task(task)) {
> > complete = false;
> > + /* Make idle task go through the main loop. */
> > + wake_up_if_idle(cpu);
> > + }
>
> This caused a build regression on non-SMP kernels:
:-(
> x86_64-linux-ld: kernel/livepatch/transition.o: in function
> `klp_try_complete_transition':
> transition.c:(.text+0x106e): undefined reference to `wake_up_if_idle'
>
> Maybe add a IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP) check to one of the if() conditions?
I'll just add a stub for that function I think. Let me rebase the thing
before I push more crap ontop..
