On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 02:05:00PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Wed 2021-09-22 13:05:09, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > +static int klp_check_task(struct task_struct *task, void *arg)
>
> Please, call this klp_check_and_switch_task() to make it clear
> that it actually does the switch.
Sure.
> > + ret = task_try_func(task, klp_check_task, &old_name);
> > + switch (ret) {
> > + case -EBUSY:
> > + pr_debug("%s: %s:%d is running\n",
> > + __func__, task->comm, task->pid);
> > + break;
> > + case -EINVAL:
> > + pr_debug("%s: %s:%d has an unreliable stack\n",
> > + __func__, task->comm, task->pid);
> > + break;
> > + case -EADDRINUSE:
> > + pr_debug("%s: %s:%d is sleeping on function %s\n",
> > + __func__, task->comm, task->pid, old_name);
> > + break;
>
> I would prefer to be on the safe side and catch error codes that might
> eventually appear in the future.
>
> case 0:
> /* success */
> break;
case -EAGAIN:
/* task_try_func() raced */
break;
> default:
> pr_debug("%s: Unknown error code (%d) when trying to switch %s:%d\n",
> __func__, ret, task->comm, task->pid);
>
> > }
Done.
