On 5/6/21 10:44 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 10:32:30AM -0500, Madhavan T. Venkataraman wrote: >> On 5/6/21 10:30 AM, Madhavan T. Venkataraman wrote: > >>> OK. I could make the section an argument to SYM_CODE*() so that a developer >>> will never miss that. Some documentation may be in order so the guidelines >>> are clear. I will do the doc patch separately, if that is alright with >>> you all. > >> There is just one problem with this. Sometimes, there is some data in the >> same text section. That data will not get included when we do the SYM_CODE(section) >> change. > > Yes, data would need to be handled separately still. That doesn't seem > insurmountable though? > I will think of something. Madhavan
