Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: Detect FTRACE cases that make the stack trace unreliable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 03:43:12PM -0500, madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> When CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS is enabled and tracing is activated
> for a function, the ftrace infrastructure is called for the function at
> the very beginning. Ftrace creates two frames:

This looks good to me however I'd really like someone who has a firmer
understanding of what ftrace is doing to double check as it is entirely
likely that I am missing cases here, it seems likely that if I am
missing stuff it's extra stuff that needs to be added and we're not
actually making use of the reliability information yet.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux