On 3/18/21 1:26 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 11:57:55AM -0500, madvenka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> + /* Terminal record, nothing to unwind */
>> + if (fp == (unsigned long) regs->stackframe) {
>> + if (regs->frame_type == TASK_FRAME ||
>> + regs->frame_type == EL0_FRAME)
>> + return -ENOENT;
>> return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>
> This is conflating the reliable stacktrace checks (which your series
> will later flag up with frame->reliable) with verifying that we found
> the bottom of the stack by looking for this terminal stack frame record.
> For the purposes of determining if the unwinder got to the bottom of the
> stack we don't care what stack type we're looking at, we just care if it
> managed to walk to this defined final record.
>
> At the minute nothing except reliable stack trace has any intention of
> checking the specific return code but it's clearer to be consistent.
>
So, you are saying that the type check is redundant. OK. I will remove it
and just return -ENOENT on reaching the final record.
Madhavan
