Re: [PATCH v4 11/11] module: Make module_enable_ro() static again

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



+++ Jessica Yu [30/04/20 13:40 +0200]:
+++ Miroslav Benes [30/04/20 13:35 +0200]:
On Thu, 30 Apr 2020, Jessica Yu wrote:

+++ Josh Poimboeuf [29/04/20 10:24 -0500]:
Now that module_enable_ro() has no more external users, make it static
again.

Suggested-by: Jessica Yu <jeyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks! Since this patch is separate from the rest and it's based on
modules-next, I can just take this last patch through the modules tree.

It depends on 8/11 of the series.

Acked-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>

for the patch.

Ah yeah, you are right (you meant patch 9/11 right)? Will take both
through modules-next.

So I'm speaking nonsense apparently. I suggested taking them because
the module patches were based on modules-next. But Miroslav correctly
pointed out that these patches still depend on livepatch removing
module_disable_ro() usage before we can even remove them from
module.c.

So ignore what I said earlier, the whole patchset should be applied
together (I'm assuming the livepatching for-next branch). In any case,
should there be any conflicts with modules-next they should be easy to
resolve. Sorry for the noise!

Jessica



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux