+++ Jessica Yu [30/04/20 13:40 +0200]:
+++ Miroslav Benes [30/04/20 13:35 +0200]:
On Thu, 30 Apr 2020, Jessica Yu wrote:
+++ Josh Poimboeuf [29/04/20 10:24 -0500]:
Now that module_enable_ro() has no more external users, make it static
again.
Suggested-by: Jessica Yu <jeyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks! Since this patch is separate from the rest and it's based on
modules-next, I can just take this last patch through the modules tree.
It depends on 8/11 of the series.
Acked-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
for the patch.
Ah yeah, you are right (you meant patch 9/11 right)? Will take both
through modules-next.
So I'm speaking nonsense apparently. I suggested taking them because
the module patches were based on modules-next. But Miroslav correctly
pointed out that these patches still depend on livepatch removing
module_disable_ro() usage before we can even remove them from
module.c.
So ignore what I said earlier, the whole patchset should be applied
together (I'm assuming the livepatching for-next branch). In any case,
should there be any conflicts with modules-next they should be easy to
resolve. Sorry for the noise!
Jessica
