On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 05:02:16PM +0200, Jessica Yu wrote: > +++ Josh Poimboeuf [14/04/20 11:28 -0500]: > > With arch_klp_init_object_loaded() gone, and apply_relocate_add() now > > using text_poke(), livepatch no longer needs to use module_disable_ro(). > > > > The text_mutex usage can also be removed -- its purpose was to protect > > against module permission change races. > > > > Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > kernel/livepatch/core.c | 8 -------- > > 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/kernel/livepatch/core.c b/kernel/livepatch/core.c > > index 817676caddee..3a88639b3326 100644 > > --- a/kernel/livepatch/core.c > > +++ b/kernel/livepatch/core.c > > @@ -767,10 +767,6 @@ static int klp_init_object_loaded(struct klp_patch *patch, > > struct klp_modinfo *info = patch->mod->klp_info; > > > > if (klp_is_module(obj)) { > > - > > - mutex_lock(&text_mutex); > > - module_disable_ro(patch->mod); > > - > > Don't you still need the text_mutex to use text_poke() though? > (Through klp_write_relocations -> apply_relocate_add -> text_poke) > At least, I see this assertion there: > > void *text_poke(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len) > { > lockdep_assert_held(&text_mutex); > > return __text_poke(addr, opcode, len); > } Hm, guess I should have tested with lockdep ;-) -- Josh