Re: [PATCH v4 15/16] module: Move where we mark modules RO,X

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 10:43:00AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> But none of that explains why apply_alternatives() is also delayed.
> 
> So I'm very tempted to just revert that patchset for doing it all
> wrong.

And I've done just that. This includes Josh's validation patch, the
revert and my klp_appy_relocations_add() patches with the removal of
module_disable_ro().

Josh, can you test or give me clue on how to test? I need to run a few
errands today, but I'll try and have a poke either tonight or tomorrow.

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git x86/rwx

After this it is waiting for Mark's argh64 patches to land:

  https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191021163426.9408-5-mark.rutland@xxxxxxx

And then we can go and delete module_disable_ro() entirely -- hooray!



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux