Re: [PATCH] ftrace/x86: Add a comment to why we take text_mutex in ftrace_arch_code_modify_prepare()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 09:18:19PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> 
> From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Taking the text_mutex in ftrace_arch_code_modify_prepare() is to fix a
> race against module loading and live kernel patching that might try to
> change the text permissions while ftrace has it as read/write. This
> really needs to be documented in the code. Add a comment that does such.
> 
> Suggested-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
> index 33786044d5ac..d7e93b2783fd 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,11 @@
>  
>  int ftrace_arch_code_modify_prepare(void)
>  {
> +	/*
> +	 * Need to grab text_mutex to prevent a race from module loading
> +	 * and live kernel patching from changing the text permissions while
> +	 * ftrace has it set to "read/write".
> +	 */
>  	mutex_lock(&text_mutex);
>  	set_kernel_text_rw();
>  	set_all_modules_text_rw();
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 

Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Josh



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux