On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 15:30 -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > The ORC data format does have a few downsides compared to DWARF. The > > ORC unwind tables take up ~1MB more memory than DWARF eh_frame tables. > > > Can we have an option to just use dwarf instead? For people > who don't want to waste a MB+ to solve a problem that doesn't > exist (as proven by many years of opensuse kernel experience) Sure the dwarf unwinder works well for crashes, but at the price of demolishing ftrace/perf utility. -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe live-patching" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
