* Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Plus, shouldn't we use __packed for 'struct undwarf' to minimize the > > structure's size (to 6 bytes AFAICS?) - or is optimal packing of the main > > undwarf array already guaranteed on every platform with this layout? > > Ah yes, it should definitely be packed (assuming that doesn't affect performance > negatively). So if I count that correctly that should shave another ~1MB off a typical ~4MB table size? Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe live-patching" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
