> If you are referring to stacking livepatches ... to be honest I hadn't > thought of that scenario. In that case, we might be able to get away > with pushing something like this into the hash: > > klp #1: klp_shadow_attach(ptr, "shadow_var", ...) > klp #2: klp_shadow_attach(ptr, "shadow_var_v2", ...) I thought this was the reason to have a string there. Otherwise, a pointer to original data would be enough, wouldn't it? Miroslav -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe live-patching" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
