Re: [WARNING] livepatch/x86: Invalid return address when checking a stack of the schedule stuff

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 01:50:36PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I have just tried to apply the livepatch-sample module using
> the consistency model in current Linus' tree (4.12-rc2) and
> got the following warning from the stack checker code:
> 
> [   28.580616] livepatch_sample: tainting kernel with TAINT_LIVEPATCH
> [   28.581572] livepatch_sample: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel
> [   28.589943] livepatch: enabling patch 'livepatch_sample'
> [   28.592146] livepatch: 'livepatch_sample': patching...
> [   28.592643] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [   28.593069] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3699 at arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c:132 save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable+0x133/0x1a0

Thanks, I was able to recreate it too.  We should really add
livepatch-sample loading to the kernel selftests.

This seems to be caused by:

  ff3f7e2475bb ("x86/entry: Fix the end of the stack for newly forked tasks")

I'm not sure what I was smoking when I made that patch because now it
seems completely wrong.  Need to think about it a little more.

-- 
Josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe live-patching" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux