> > If not, we get back to exit_to_usermode_loop() and TIF_PATCH_PENDING is > > cleared. Yes, it is true that TIF_SIGPENDING is still set and we get to > > do_signal() once more. But for the last time. > > Yes, slightly sub-optimal but not really wrong and you can swap > do_signal() and klp_update_patch_state(). Ok. I'll add it to v2. > > If the syscall is restarted, it may be different. I have to think about > > this one. But... > > Afaics, there are no problems. > > > In short. Thanks for correcting me and sorry for noise! Thanks for the review, Oleg. Much appreciated. Miroslav -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe live-patching" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
