[PATCH 0/3] livepatch/rcu: Handle some subtle issues between livepatching and RCU

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Steven and Paul recently discussed some issues when using RCU
functionality in ftrace handlers. A good summary can be found at
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170412115304.3077dbc8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

This discussion made us to revisit the ftrace handler used by
the livepatches. Some changes seem to be needed. A perfect solution
looks rather complicated. I have implemented a sub-optimal
one and split it into three patches for easier review.

Please, note that we were on the safe side before introducing
the hybrid consistency model. The ftrace handler worked correctly
with empty function stack. Also the patch removal was not possible.
But we need to be more careful now.


Petr Mladek (3):
  livepatch/rcu: Guarantee consistency when patching idle kthreads
  livepatch/rcu: Warn when system consistency is broken in RCU code
  livepatch/rcu: Disable livepatch removal when safety is not guaranteed

 Documentation/livepatch/livepatch.txt | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/livepatch/patch.c              | 14 ++++++++++++++
 kernel/livepatch/transition.c         |  7 ++++++-
 kernel/livepatch/transition.h         |  2 ++
 4 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

-- 
1.8.5.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe live-patching" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux