klp_ftrace_handler() and klp_disable_func()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

I am not very familiar with the internals of ftrace, hence this question.

Suppose klp_ftrace_handler() is running on one CPU and, at the same time, klp_disable_func() calls unregister_ftrace_function() and then ftrace_set_filter_ip() on another CPU.

Is it guaranteed then, that by the time ftrace_set_filter_ip() returns, klp_ftrace_handler() is no longer running?

klp_disable_func() is written with this assumption in mind as it kfrees struct klp_ops instance that klp_ftrace_handler() might be using.

Nothing crashed in my experiments with that code so far, it is just not obvious to me if the above guarantee exists.

Regards,
Evgenii
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe live-patching" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux