Re: [PATCH 08/12] x86/dumpstack: Pin the target stack in save_stack_trace_tsk()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:41:25AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> I also wouldn't mind trying to do something to prevent ever dumping
> the stack of an actively running task.  It's definitely safe to dump:
> 
>  - current
> 
>  - any task that's stopped via ptrace, etc
> 
>  - any task on the current CPU if running atomically enough that the
> task can't migrate (which probably covers the nasty NMI cases, I hope)
> 
> What's *not* safe AFAIK is /proc/PID/stack.  I don't know if we can
> somehow fix that short of actually sending an interrupt or NMI to
> freeze the task if it's running.  I'm also not sure it's worth
> worrying about it.

Yeah, I proposed a fix for /proc/PID/stack a while back:

  https://lkml.kernel.org/r/cover.1424109806.git.jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx

My idea was to use task_rq_lock() to lock the runqueue and then check
tsk->on_cpu.  I think Peter wasn't too keen on it.

We'll need something similar for the livepatch consistency model.

-- 
Josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe live-patching" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux