On Wed, 6 Apr 2016, Chris J Arges wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 02:09:01PM +0200, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> > On Wed, 6 Apr 2016, Chris J Arges wrote:
> >
> > > I think this approach needs more thought and my code has bug(s).
> >
> > And indeed there is...
> >
> > long (*__kvm_arch_vm_ioctl)(struct file *filp, unsigned long ioctl, unsigned long arg) = NULL;
> >
> > Use a different name than __kvm_arch_vm_ioctl and (ideally) make it
> > static.
> >
> > kallsyms_lookup_name("__kvm_arch_vm_ioctl") returns the address of this
> > variable from the patch module.
> >
> > Miroslav
> >
>
> Well that was the bug, I was really stumped why it was giving me a wierd
> address for a function. Once I changed my pointer name to something else it
> worked, so there was no difference to these approaches. I also had to modify
> the symbol lookup to happen in the livepatch so we ensure that the module is
> loaded in this case and not get a NULL deref.
Just a remark. With this change there is a call to kallsyms_lookup_name
for each call to patched function. This is not optimal. What we do in
kgraft is that we register a module notifier which calls
kallsyms_lookup_name when to-be-patched module arrives. It is not nice but
it works.
Miroslav
>
> The fixed code is here:
> http://people.canonical.com/~arges/livepatch_issue/livepatch_kvm_arch_vm_ioctl.works.2/
>
> This out of tree patch doesn't have the same failure as building a patch with
> kpatch-build which is what we expect since it doesn't have livepatch relocs. In
> addition I tested with the kvm module loaded _after_ the livepatch module and
> no failure was observed.
>
> --chris
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe live-patching" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
