On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 21:35:29 +0100 (CET)
Jiri Kosina <jikos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Feb 2016, Jessica Yu wrote:
>
> > Remove the ftrace module notifier in favor of directly calling
> > ftrace_module_enable() and ftrace_release_mod() in the module loader.
> > Hard-coding the function calls directly in the module loader removes
> > dependence on the module notifier call chain and provides better
> > visibility and control over what gets called when, which is important
> > to kernel utilities such as livepatch.
> >
> > This fixes a notifier ordering issue in which the ftrace module notifier
> > (and hence ftrace_module_enable()) for coming modules was being called
> > after klp_module_notify(), which caused livepatch modules to initialize
> > incorrectly. This patch removes dependence on the module notifier call
> > chain in favor of hard coding the corresponding function calls in the
> > module loader. This ensures that ftrace and livepatch code get called in
> > the correct order on patch module load and unload.
> >
> > Fixes: 5156dca34a3e ("ftrace: Fix the race between ftrace and insmod")
> > Signed-off-by: Jessica Yu <jeyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Steven, I am going to assume that your Reviewed-by: still holds for the
> patch even though it has been removed from the 4-patch series; if you
> don't agree, please speak up. Otherwise, I am going to apply it and push
> it to Linus for -rc5 still (as it fixes our regression).
>
This week has been very busy. Did the patch change at all?
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe live-patching" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
