* Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:00:00PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > All of the cases Josh listed involve some sort of special case where we do > > something non-standard. (Where 'standard' == 'regular kernel C function'.) > > My only worry is that next time we have to do something non-standard, > we'll have to annotate it as well. bpf_jit case-in-point. but that's generally OK: it's not a problem if something non-standard is visibly non-standard on the source code level as well. > OTOH, I guess the generic, tool-agnostic annotation could be a step in the > (more-)right direction as we're saying "we're doing something special here, and > we're stating that fact with this here annotation." Yeah, I think so too! Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe live-patching" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
