On Tue, 05 May 2015 15:27:19 +0200 Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx> wrote: > What I could do is to split them and make this setup: > > _TIF_WORK: > TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME 0 > TIF_SIGPENDING 1 > TIF_NEED_RESCHED 2 > TIF_KGR_IN_PROGRESS_W 3 > TIF_UPROBE 7 > > _TIF_TRACE: > TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE 24 > TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT 25 > TIF_SECCOMP 26 > TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT 27 > TIF_KGR_IN_PROGRESS_T 28 > > ===== > > Then make TIF_KGR_IN_PROGRESS_W fire when "tm"-ing _TIF_WORK in > "__TI_flags+7". TIF_KGR_IN_PROGRESS_T will work along with _TIF_TRACE > using "tm" on "__TI_flags+4". > > What do you think? Yes, that is what I had in mind. Feel free to reorder the TIF bits in any way necessary. I have done that several times already. -- blue skies, Martin. "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe live-patching" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
