On 04/28/15 at 01:29P, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Mon, 27 Apr 2015, Minfei Huang wrote: > > > Found that kaslr_enabled is only exist for x86. Maybe you can define a > > weak function klp_adjustment_function_addr in general. Then each arch > > can overwrite the function to implemente it specially. > > It might start to make sense once there is at least one additional arch > that supports kaslr. Currently, I don't see a benefit. > > Why are you so obstinate about this? I personally don't find that > important at all; it's something that can always be sorted out once more > archs start supporting kaslr. > ohhh... Previously, IMO, putting the relevant function address adjustment into the specified arch is more clearly to be reviewed and understood. Now, I know what you actual want according to above commit, I am fine with it. Thanks Minfei > Thanks, > > -- > Jiri Kosina > SUSE Labs > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe live-patching" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe live-patching" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
