On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 1:44 AM, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 16 Dec 2014, Balbir Singh wrote: > >> Could you describe what this does to signing? I presume the patched >> module should cause a taint on module signing? > > Hmm, why should it? > I wanted to clarify it from a different perspective If the base image is signed by X and the patched module is signed by Y, is that supported. What does it imply in the case of live-patching? Balbir Singh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe live-patching" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
