Re: [RFC 4/5] check,common/config: Add support for central fsconfig

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Anand Jain <anand.jain@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 10/1/25 17:10, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
>> This adds support to pick and use any existing FS config from
>> configs/<fstype>/<config>. e.g.
>> 
>> configs/xfs/1k
>> configs/xfs/4k
>> configs/ext4/4k
>> configs/ext4/64k
>> 
>> This should help us maintain and test different fs test
>> configurations from a central place. We also hope that
>> this will be useful for both developers and testers to
>> look into what is being actively maintained and tested
>> by FS Maintainers.
>> 
>> When we will have fsconfigs set, then will be another subdirectory created
>> in results/<section>. For example let's look at the following:
>> 
>> The directory tree structure on running
>> sudo ./check -q 2 -R xunit-quiet -c xfs/4k,configs/xfs/1k selftest/001 selftest/007
>> 
>
>
> The -c option check makes sense to me. Is it possible to get this
> feature implemented first while the -q option is still under discussion?

Hi Anand, 

Thanks for trying the patches. The design of -c option is still under
discussion [1]. But it will be helpful if you could help us understand
your reasons for finding -c option useful :) 

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/Z55RXUKB5O5l8QjM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

>
> That said, I have a suggestion for the -c option—
>   Global config variables should be overridden by file system-specific 
> config files.
>
> For example, if configs/localhost.config contains:
>
> MKFS_OPTIONS="--sectorsize 64K"
>
> but configs/<fstype>/some_config sets:
>
> MKFS_OPTIONS=""
>
> then the value from configs/<fstype>/some_config should take priority.
>
> I ran some tests with btrfs, and I don’t see this behavior happening yet.

I think that was intentional. I guess the reasoning was, we don't want to
break use cases for folks who still wanted to use local.config file
option.

However, in the new proposed design [2] we are thinking of having 1
large config per filesystem. e.g. configs/btrfs/config.btrfs which will
define all of the relevant sections e.g. btrfs_4k, btrfs_64k, ...  Then
on invokking "make", it will generate a single large fs config file i.e.
configs/.all-sections-configs which will club all filesystems section
configs together.

Now when someone invokes check script with different -s options, it will
first look into local.config file, if local.config not found, then it
will look into configs/.all-sections-configs to get the relevant section
defines.

This hopefully should address all the other concerns which were raised
on the current central fs config design.

[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/87plj0hp7e.fsf@xxxxxxxxx/

-ritesh

>
> Thanks, Anand




[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux