Re: [regression 6.14-rc2 + xfs-for-next] Bad page state at unmount

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 02:50:13PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> I hit this running check-parallel a moment ago:
> 
> [80180.074658] BUG: Bad page cache in process umount  pfn:7655f4
> [80180.077259] page: refcount:9 mapcount:1 mapping:00000000ecd1b54a index:0x0 pfn:0x7655f4
> [80180.080573] head: order:2 mapcount:4 entire_mapcount:0 nr_pages_mapped:4 pincount:0
> [80180.083615] memcg:ffff888104f36000
> [80180.084977] aops:xfs_address_space_operations ino:84
> [80180.087175] flags: 0x17ffffc000016d(locked|referenced|uptodate|lru|active|head|node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0x1fffff)
> [80180.091380] raw: 0017ffffc000016d ffffea001745c648 ffffea0012b1da08 ffff8891726dae98
> [80180.094469] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000900000000 ffff888104f36000
> [80180.097740] head: 0017ffffc000016d ffffea001745c648 ffffea0012b1da08 ffff8891726dae98
> [80180.100988] head: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000900000000 ffff888104f36000
> [80180.104129] head: 0017ffffc0000202 ffffea001d957d01 ffffffff00000003 0000000000000004
> [80180.107232] head: 0000000000000004 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> [80180.110338] page dumped because: still mapped when deleted

Do you have CONFIG_PT_RECLAIM enabled?  If so, it's buggy (see linux-mm
for a fix if you don't want to disable it).




[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux