Re: [PATCH RFC 02/10] xfs: Refactor xfs_reflink_end_cow_extent()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/02/2025 19:50, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
index 59f7fc16eb80..580469668334 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
@@ -786,35 +786,20 @@ xfs_reflink_update_quota(
   * requirements as low as possible.
   */
  STATIC int
-xfs_reflink_end_cow_extent(
+xfs_reflink_end_cow_extent_locked(
  	struct xfs_inode	*ip,
  	xfs_fileoff_t		*offset_fsb,
-	xfs_fileoff_t		end_fsb)
+	xfs_fileoff_t		end_fsb,
+	struct xfs_trans	*tp,
+	bool			*commit)
Transactions usually come before the inode in the parameter list.

ok


You don't need to pass out a @commit flag -- if the function returns
nonzero then the caller has to cancel the transaction; otherwise it will
return zero and the caller should commit it.>  There's no penalty for
committing a non-dirty transaction.

If there is no penalty, then fine. But I don't feel totally comfortable with this and would prefer to keep the same behavior.

Thanks,
John







[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux