Re: [PATCH V2] xfs: Do not allow norecovery mount with quotacheck

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 08:18:06AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 11:02:54AM +0100, cem@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Carlos Maiolino <cem@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Mounting a filesystem that requires quota state changing will generate a
> > transaction.
> >
> > We already check for a read-only device; we should do that for
> > norecovery too.
> >
> > A quotacheck on a norecovery mount, and with the right log size, will cause
> > the mount process to hang on:
> >
> > [<0>] xlog_grant_head_wait+0x5d/0x2a0 [xfs]
> > [<0>] xlog_grant_head_check+0x112/0x180 [xfs]
> > [<0>] xfs_log_reserve+0xe3/0x260 [xfs]
> > [<0>] xfs_trans_reserve+0x179/0x250 [xfs]
> > [<0>] xfs_trans_alloc+0x101/0x260 [xfs]
> > [<0>] xfs_sync_sb+0x3f/0x80 [xfs]
> > [<0>] xfs_qm_mount_quotas+0xe3/0x2f0 [xfs]
> > [<0>] xfs_mountfs+0x7ad/0xc20 [xfs]
> > [<0>] xfs_fs_fill_super+0x762/0xa50 [xfs]
> > [<0>] get_tree_bdev_flags+0x131/0x1d0
> > [<0>] vfs_get_tree+0x26/0xd0
> > [<0>] vfs_cmd_create+0x59/0xe0
> > [<0>] __do_sys_fsconfig+0x4e3/0x6b0
> > [<0>] do_syscall_64+0x82/0x160
> > [<0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
> >
> > This is caused by a transaction running with bogus initialized head/tail
> >
> > I initially hit this while running generic/050, with random log
> > sizes, but I managed to reproduce it reliably here with the steps
> > below:
> >
> > mkfs.xfs -f -lsize=1025M -f -b size=4096 -m crc=1,reflink=1,rmapbt=1, -i
> > sparse=1 /dev/vdb2 > /dev/null
> > mount -o usrquota,grpquota,prjquota /dev/vdb2 /mnt
> > xfs_io -x -c 'shutdown -f' /mnt
> > umount /mnt
> > mount -o ro,norecovery,usrquota,grpquota,prjquota  /dev/vdb2 /mnt
> >
> > Last mount hangs up
> >
> > As we add yet another validation if quota state is changing, this also
> > add a new helper named xfs_qm_validate(), factoring the quota state
> > changes out of xfs_qm_newmount() to reduce cluttering within it.
> >
> > As per Darrick suggestion, add a new, different  warning message if
> > metadir is enabled.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cem@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > Changelog V1->V2:
> > 	- Issue a different warn message in case metadir is enabled
> > 	- Factour out quota state validator code to a new helper
> > 	- Change patch subject to reduce length
> >
> >
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_qm_bhv.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> >  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_qm_bhv.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_qm_bhv.c
> > index 37f1230e7584..a6a7870401c3 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_qm_bhv.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_qm_bhv.c
> > @@ -78,6 +78,28 @@ xfs_qm_statvfs(
> >  	}
> >  }
> >
> > +STATIC int
> > +xfs_qm_validate(
> 
> This validates ... what exactly?
> 
> Oh, it validates that we can actually make the state change.
> 
> xfs_qm_validate_state_change(), perhaps ?

Yeah, I thought the name would be too big, but indeed looks decent

> 
> > +	xfs_mount_t	*mp,
> 
> Please don't introduce more typedef usage.

Ditto, my bad, will fix.

> 
> 	struct xfs_mount	*mp,
> 
> > +	uint		uqd,
> > +	uint		gqd,
> > +	uint		pqd)
> > +{
> > +	int state;
> > +
> > +	/* Is quota state changing? */
> > +	state = ((uqd && !XFS_IS_UQUOTA_ON(mp)) ||
> > +		(!uqd &&  XFS_IS_UQUOTA_ON(mp)) ||
> > +		 (gqd && !XFS_IS_GQUOTA_ON(mp)) ||
> > +		(!gqd &&  XFS_IS_GQUOTA_ON(mp)) ||
> > +		 (pqd && !XFS_IS_PQUOTA_ON(mp)) ||
> > +		(!pqd &&  XFS_IS_PQUOTA_ON(mp)));
> > +
> > +	return  state &&
> > +		(xfs_dev_is_read_only(mp, "changing quota state") ||
> > +		xfs_has_norecovery(mp));
> > +}
> > +
> >  int
> >  xfs_qm_newmount(
> >  	xfs_mount_t	*mp,
> > @@ -97,24 +119,25 @@ xfs_qm_newmount(
> >  	}
> >
> >  	/*
> > -	 * If the device itself is read-only, we can't allow
> > -	 * the user to change the state of quota on the mount -
> > -	 * this would generate a transaction on the ro device,
> > -	 * which would lead to an I/O error and shutdown
> > +	 * If the device itself is read-only and/or in norecovery
> > +	 * mode, we can't allow the user to change the state of
> > +	 * quota on the mount - this would generate a transaction
> > +	 * on the ro device, which would lead to an I/O error and
> > +	 * shutdown.
> >  	 */
> >
> > -	if (((uquotaondisk && !XFS_IS_UQUOTA_ON(mp)) ||
> > -	    (!uquotaondisk &&  XFS_IS_UQUOTA_ON(mp)) ||
> > -	     (gquotaondisk && !XFS_IS_GQUOTA_ON(mp)) ||
> > -	    (!gquotaondisk &&  XFS_IS_GQUOTA_ON(mp)) ||
> > -	     (pquotaondisk && !XFS_IS_PQUOTA_ON(mp)) ||
> > -	    (!pquotaondisk &&  XFS_IS_PQUOTA_ON(mp)))  &&
> > -	    xfs_dev_is_read_only(mp, "changing quota state")) {
> > -		xfs_warn(mp, "please mount with%s%s%s%s.",
> > -			(!quotaondisk ? "out quota" : ""),
> > -			(uquotaondisk ? " usrquota" : ""),
> > -			(gquotaondisk ? " grpquota" : ""),
> > -			(pquotaondisk ? " prjquota" : ""));
> > +	if (xfs_qm_validate(mp, uquotaondisk,
> > +			    gquotaondisk, pquotaondisk)) {
> > +
> > +		if (xfs_has_metadir(mp))
> > +			xfs_warn(mp,
> > +			       "metadir enabled, please mount withouth quotas");
> 
> "metadir enabled, please mount without any quota mount options"

Thanks for the review, V3 soon.


> 
> --D
> 
> > +		else
> > +			xfs_warn(mp, "please mount with%s%s%s%s.",
> > +				(!quotaondisk ? "out quota" : ""),
> > +				(uquotaondisk ? " usrquota" : ""),
> > +				(gquotaondisk ? " grpquota" : ""),
> > +				(pquotaondisk ? " prjquota" : ""));
> >  		return -EPERM;
> >  	}
> >
> > --
> > 2.48.1
> >
> >
> 




[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux