On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 07:03:35AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> There hasn't been anything like an io_length for a long time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Yep, that old comment doesn't make much sense anymore
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
--D
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 5 -----
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> index dc219678003c..af3945bf7d94 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> @@ -241,11 +241,6 @@ _xfs_buf_alloc(
> bp->b_mount = target->bt_mount;
> bp->b_flags = flags;
>
> - /*
> - * Set length and io_length to the same value initially.
> - * I/O routines should use io_length, which will be the same in
> - * most cases but may be reset (e.g. XFS recovery).
> - */
> error = xfs_buf_get_maps(bp, nmaps);
> if (error) {
> kmem_cache_free(xfs_buf_cache, bp);
> --
> 2.45.2
>
>
