On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 07:27:43AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 10:20:37PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > Good point, we could cut it off right then and there. Though this seems
> > a little gross:
> >
> > if (xchk_could_repair(sc))
> > #ifdef CONFIG_XFS_ONLINE_REPAIR
> > sc->sm->sm_flags |= XFS_SCRUB_OFLAG_CORRUPT;
> > #else
> > return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > #endif
> > return 0;
> >
> > but I don't mind. Some day the stubs will go away, fingers crossed.
>
> We'll I'd write it as:
>
> if (xchk_could_repair(sc)) {
> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XFS_ONLINE_REPAIR))
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> sc->sm->sm_flags |= XFS_SCRUB_OFLAG_CORRUPT;
> }
>
> but I'm fine with either version:
I like your version /much/ better.
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Thanks!
--D
