On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:32:58 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The only non-constant value read under m_sb_lock in xfs_fs_statfs is
> sb_dblocks, and it could become stale right after dropping the lock
> anyway. Remove the thus pointless lock section.
>
>
Applied to for-next, thanks!
[1/2] xfs: don't take m_sb_lock in xfs_fs_statfs
commit: 72843ca62417a0587ca98791b172e4c3b3f8d3a8
[2/2] xfs: refactor xfs_fs_statfs
commit: dd324cb79e54d3a61621f09c346ee050315a4d2e
Best regards,
--
Carlos Maiolino <cem@xxxxxxxxxx>
