Re: [RFC] Directly mapped xattr data & fs-verity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 10:20:59AM +0100, Andrey Albershteyn wrote:
> > Maybe we can used it for $HANDWAVE is not a good idea. 
> 
> > Hash based verification works poorly for mutable files, so we'd
> > rather have a really good argument for that.
> 
> hmm, why? Not sure I have an understanding of this

You need a consistent point in time to verify with your hash to have
a meaning.  How do you define that point for a mutable file?




[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux