On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 10:37 AM Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 10:32:37AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > Could we create a separate mailing list to coordinate XFS LTS > > stable backporting work? There's enough traffic on the main XFS list > > that the LTS backports get lost in the noise, and in the future we'd > > like to have a place for our LTS testing robots to send automated email. > > > > A large portion of the upstream xfs community do not participate in LTS > > work so there's no reason to blast them with all that traffic. What do > > the rest of you think about this? > > Can this work be done on stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx? As the xfs stable maintenance process is still evolving quite a bit, there will be a decent amount more traffic for xfs than for other subsystems. I believe the actual stable patches will still go through the normal stable list and the xfs-stable will mainly serve for discussions on xfs-specific testing requirements/patch selection/process questions/etc prior to actually submitting the patches via stable. So I think it makes sense to split this out into a separate list. (did the list get created already?) - leah > > -K >
