On 12/19/24 12:32 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > Hi there, > > Could we create a separate mailing list to coordinate XFS LTS > stable backporting work? There's enough traffic on the main XFS list > that the LTS backports get lost in the noise, and in the future we'd > like to have a place for our LTS testing robots to send automated email. > > A large portion of the upstream xfs community do not participate in LTS > work so there's no reason to blast them with all that traffic. What do > the rest of you think about this? > > Address : xfs-stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Description: XFS stable LTS mailing list > Owners : djwong@xxxxxxxxxx, tytso@xxxxxxx > Allow HTML : N > Archives : Y I have no issue with this, and I think it's wise for the reasons you've stated. Even those who don't actively participate in maintaining LTS kernels may still wish to keep an eye on how things are evolving, and a dedicated list would make that easier too. If it comes to exist, are there any other -stable people, processes, or bots that should start using it too? Thanks, -Eric
