Re: [PATCH 03/10] iomap: add a IOMAP_F_ANON_WRITE flag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 10:02:08AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Do we need to error the bio instead of submitting it if
> IOMAP_F_ANON_WRITE is set here?  Or are we relying on the block
> layer/device will reject an IO to U64_MAX and produce the EIO for us?

I'd rather not add an error return where we previously didn't for
catching a grave programmer error.  I wonder if I should also drop
the error handling in the writeback submission to be consistent?





[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux